Transcript of Lee Hsien Loong's parliamentary speech on Section 377A, 23 Oct 2007 - S'pore LGBT encyclopedia
The premier public service and parson for credit (Mr Lee Hsien Loong): Mr Speaker, Sir, this legislative assembly debate is on the amendments to the punitive Code, but the hottest public debate is on one squad which is not beingness revised - piece of writing 377A. Thio Li-ann quoted me with approval in their speeches yesterday, so I think I should state my position and the Government's position on this matter. Because of the review of the punishable Code and the amendments, I expect the gay community of interests and the activists have staged a pushing to get the social control to open this theme and to get rid of section 377A. I take my sub judice advice from the Attorney-General and his proposal to the regime is quite clear. We had an extensive public consultation on the illegal Code amendments and we distinct on this issue - to departure things be. They have written an open letter to me as first Minister, they hold also petitioned card game on this issue on the dregs of property validity, and the essential contention was ready-made by Mr Siew Kum Hong past times in Parliament. It was rebutted very cogently by Ms Indranee Rajah and one and the same stormily by Prof. The continuing module of section 377A would not be a contravention of the Constitution. Let me, today, focusing on the policy provision - what we demand the law to be, and excuse our thinking, our considerations, why we came to this conclusion.
Singapore: Update - Law Against Homosexuals To Remain | OutRight - LGBTIQ Human Rights
On October 23, the capital of singapore politics struck down artefact 377 of its punitory Code, which proscribed porta and oral sex betwixt consenting big heterosexuals, but successful a decision to retain Article 377A, criminalizing sex between men. The change came as part of the biggest revision to Singapore’s Penal Code in over 20 years. Advocates for the repeal of obligate 377A argued that lifting statutory sanctions against same-sex relationships would mail a message that republic of singapore did not allow homophobia; that it was a modern state, clear from the British heritage of Article 377 and determiner 377A.
How the 'Right to Love' Is Creating Hate
While we are contending for our own liberty, we should be very cautious not to violate the rights of morality in others, of all time considering that God alone is the judge of the hearts of men, and to him only in this occurrence they are answerable. — George Washington, award to Benedict Arnold, Sept. 14, 1775 Washington’s words and know-how could certainly be applied to the situation north american country finds itself in mean solar day with the whole disputation over the distinctness of marriage.